Author's Note: Okay, I wrote this in the point that whoever is reading this has already previously read the story.Also, I'm kind of writing in a slight style that is similar to the story's style.
Insanity Past All Limits: The Tell-Tale Heart
Fariha M
Spying, stalking, and finally murdering. What gives you the thought that this narrator is sane? "The Tell- Tale Heart" is not about a murder, but about the loss of sanity. To prove sanity does one have the must to lie, to kill, and to beg? In this case, all of that is proven true. Though we see from different points of view, do we see the truth? The truth behind the lies, the truth behind the screams, and the truth of the insanity? Yes, yes we do. The truth- it's a foul stench coming from a corpse decapitated and hidden under a flooring of wood: the narrator, in "The Tell-Tale Heart" is insane.
Sentence after sentence, the narrator attempts to prove his sanity but ends in doing the opposite.
In the very first few sentences he states to the reader that he is sane. That is exactly why we suspect his insanity. He starts to defend himself while there isn't even a question in play. We never had questioned him, yet he tries to make us agree with his sanity and release him from his personal hell. He is anticipating our judgments, knowing what he has done are the actions of a madman. Knowing himself that he is mad, he persists to make us agree with his sanity as well as fool himself to agree with his own lies.
Forget that, ignore his persistence of an unneeded answer, and notice his tone. His tone, his desperate begging, and his pleas: notice them. Every stupid action that he has done may have a logical explanation. But, what was he doing during those actions? What was he thinking? Had he gone mad at a moment of time and soon recovered after all was said and done- after he admits to the deed? He begs us to see what he sees. When he describes what he has done and notices that only a fool or one who has gone mad would do this, he suddenly finds a reason to make this insane action sane and explainable. His tone also becomes another sign of his madness.
Are these reasons agreeable to? If you really still disagree, then think about why the narrator murders the man. Just for spying it takes him an hour to bring his head through the door, and an hour to retreat it. I must say, a man that is capable to have this carefulness he can't be mad. But look at the facts. If a man really was sane he wouldn't have to spend an hour to look through a door to spy on an eye. Yes an eye; the narrator had no problems with the man. A matter of fact- he states that, "Object there was none. Passion there was none. I loved the old man. He had never wronged me. He had never given me insult. For his gold I had no desire. I think it was his eye!" This shows that this narrator was mad enough to kill a man for his blind eye. You see, it must have been cataracts that had caused a pale blue film to grow over the pupil of this man's eye. But does that mean that this eye is evil?! Does that mean that a man should be killed for his disability?! No it doesn't! So, there you have it, another reason a pure source of insanity is visible through this narrators actions. Not only are the reasons this man is murdered insane- the way he was murdered is also just as horrifying!
To kill a man for something he can't help- is pure evil. The only excuse for this would be insanity. Insanity, it's such a large point in this story. And it definitely showed through actions. To spy on a man, an hour is consumed to bring ones head through the door. Another hour is taken when a head retreats out of that door. Not only that, this is done for seven nights straight only at midnight. Such timing is being played; the wariness of the narrator leads to madness because of how long being wary is taken to. The character is shown of being a slight bit tipsy. Something that is just short of proper or perfect could have driven this character madder than he already is. If a minute or even if a second had been off, this narrator could have and most likely would have broken into spasms. There are absolutely no facts that can prove this man sane in any way possible. Even if you look into his past, there are no signs that could lead up to sanity.
His past is actually mentioned a few times in the story. Right at the start it is mentioned that he had a disease. It was a disease that had sharpened his senses. He could hear much more than an average human. He personally states that "I heard all things in the heaven and in the earth. I heard many things in hell." A sane person is unable to do this. Even if a person’s hearing is acute- there is no chance that a man has the powers to hear what cannot be heard. Along with his hearing, his sense of smell, touch and taste were improved. Also, his sight was much better than before. He should have been able to see clearer than before. Unfortunately, he wasn't able to see clear enough that he could see through his own miserable lies.
That is what all his excuses are. Just plain lies. WE can see through them, but he is unable to. If studied closer, you can find other details that will itch you at the back of your head. And it is not until we see that all of his words are lies, can we realize that this man really is insane. There is no right for a man to commit these actions in a state of working senses; this is what can officially conclude that this man really is insane. There is nothing that can change this fact that has been repeated so many times and has been carved into stone. "Some things are brought into light. Some things are dragged into light. And some things are always in the light, but never are seen" Unknown



















